Mediapro claims latest win in Spain’s long-running ‘football war’

The Provincial Court of Madrid has ordered media company Prisa to pay the Mediapro agency €51m ($57.7m) in compensation following the latest development in the long-running ‘football war’ over rights to LaLiga, the top division of the domestic game.

The court order concerns damages to Mediapro for the interim measures Prisa applied for to the Court of First Instance No. 36 in Madrid, and which the Court granted in October 2007, prohibiting Mediapro from exploiting the media rights of football clubs to which it was the rights-holder. The Provincial Court in Madrid revoked these measures in July 2008.

Mediapro said in a statement: “The sentence reconfirms the good name of Mediapro in what became known as ‘the football war’ and the illegality of Prisa’s claims, which, after almost 10 years of litigation, have been penalised by the courts time and time again.

“The sentence establishes that the interim measures applied by Court 36 allowed Prisa to exploit rights owned by Mediapro, thus depriving Mediapro of exploitation rights and incurring damages amounting to €51m.”

The circumstances surrounding the case date back to August 2007, when Prisa accused Mediapro of breach of contract and cut access to its client’s signal for football matches and subsequent broadcast distribution and international distribution.

Prisa claimed that Mediapro was not independently entitled to enter into contracts with football clubs, a claim that the agency openly criticised as contrary to competition laws.

The two parties have been engaged in lengthy legal battles over the case. In July 2017, the Court of First Instance No. 37 of Barcelona rejected the case brought by Prisa by which it sought to overturn a ruling made by the Supreme Court in January 2015, which stated that the model of football rights exploitation used by Prisa breached fair competition rules.

Most recent

Social media giant Facebook’s challenges around its Copa Libertadores coverage in Latin America have convinced it that non-exclusive rights models form “one of the best ways” of breaking into markets where entrenched viewing habits restrict the potential for exclusive rights to grow engagement with the platform.

The Football Association rejected a higher bid for domestic FA Cup rights for the 2021-25 cycle from incumbent pay-television broadcaster BT Sport in favour of commercial broadcaster ITV, SportBusiness Media understands, in a move that took the competition exclusively free to air in the UK.

Spanish football’s LaLiga extended its rights deal in China with Wuhan DDMC Culture in May without going to market, where it would have faced a tough task maintaining its income, SportBusiness Media understands. The Chinese rights market has cooled since the previous deal was agreed, and DDMC is thought to be paying the league a strong rights fee.

South African pay-television operator Multichoice is facing the biggest challenge in its 26-year history in the form of a two-pronged regulatory attack on its dominant position in the country’s sports-rights market.