HomeNewsCricketUSA

Star India to switch to OTT in US

Star India’s channels will be withdrawn from US pay-television platforms in the New Year, with the broadcaster opting to push its programming through its Hotstar OTT service in the country.

From January 5, Hotstar will be the home of all of Star India’s channels, which will disappear from providers such as Comcast, Dish TV, Sling TV and Verizon.

Star India is the global rights-holder of the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s domestic competitions and home matches through to 2022-23.

A spokesperson for Star India told the Indian Television news website that the broadcaster believes a digital-only approach in the US “would best suit the market”.

However, the report added that Star India’s coverage of the Indian Premier League Twenty20 cricket tournament is still likely to be available via the Fox network’s pay-television channels under a sublicensing deal.

Hotstar is available for $9.99 per month or $99.99 per year in the US.

Most recent

Social media giant Facebook’s challenges around its Copa Libertadores coverage in Latin America have convinced it that non-exclusive rights models form “one of the best ways” of breaking into markets where entrenched viewing habits restrict the potential for exclusive rights to grow engagement with the platform.

The Football Association rejected a higher bid for domestic FA Cup rights for the 2021-25 cycle from incumbent pay-television broadcaster BT Sport in favour of commercial broadcaster ITV, SportBusiness Media understands, in a move that took the competition exclusively free to air in the UK.

Spanish football’s LaLiga extended its rights deal in China with Wuhan DDMC Culture in May without going to market, where it would have faced a tough task maintaining its income, SportBusiness Media understands. The Chinese rights market has cooled since the previous deal was agreed, and DDMC is thought to be paying the league a strong rights fee.

South African pay-television operator Multichoice is facing the biggest challenge in its 26-year history in the form of a two-pronged regulatory attack on its dominant position in the country’s sports-rights market.